Syrisches Statement gegen Nato-Intervention
Angesichts der Debatte um eine Nato-Intervention in Syrien und der Unsicherheiten die der Krieg in Libyen innerhalb der deutschen Linken ausgelöst hat möchten wir euch Folgende Stellungnahme der Local Coordinating Committees (LCC) aus Syrien ans Herz legen. Die LCC sind eine heterogene Vernetzung lokaler Grasroot-Committees und damit eine zentrale Struktur des syrischen Aufstandes. Wärend unseres IL-Camps im August hatten wir die Gelegenheit mit VertreterInnen des LCC in Kontakt zu treten, dennoch können wir natürlich nicht sagen für wie große Teile der Aufstandsbewegung sie sprechen.
Für mehr Informationen zur Lage in Syrien empfehlen wir euch folgenden Bericht:
Statement to the Syrian People
In an unprecedented move over the past several days, Syrians in Syria and abroad have been calling for Syrians to take up arms, or for international military intervention. This call comes five and a half months of the Syrian regime’s systematic abuse of the Syrian people, whereby tens of thousands of peaceful protesters have been detained and tortured, and more than 2,500 killed. The regime has given every indication that it will continue its rutal approach, while the majority of Syrians feel they are unprotected in their own homeland in the face of the regime’s crimes. While we understand the motivation to take up arms or call for military intervention, we specifically reject this position as we find it unacceptable politically, nationally, and ethically. Militarizing the revolution would minimize popular support and participation in the revolution. Moreover, militarization would undermine the gravity of the humanitarian catastrophe involved in a confrontation with the regime. Militarization would put the Revolution in an arena where the regime has a distinct advantage, and would erode the moral superiority that has characterized the Revolution since its beginning. Our Palestinian brothers are experienced in leading by example. They gained the support of the entire Palestinian community, as well as world sympathy, during the first Intifada (“stones”). The second Intifada, which was militarized, lost public sympathy and participation. It is important to note that the Syrian regime and Israeli enemy used identical measures in the face of the two uprisings. The objective of Syria's Revolution is not limited to overthrowing the regime. The Revolution also seeks to build a democratic system and national infrastructure that safeguards the freedom and dignity of the Syrian people. Moreover, the Revolution is intended to ensure independence and unity of Syria, its people, and its society. We believe that the overthrow of the regime is the initial goal of the Revolution, but it is not an end in itself. The end goal is freedom for Syria and all Syrians. The method by which the regime is overthrown is an indication of what Syria will be like post-regime. If we maintain our peaceful demonstrations, which include our cities, towns, and villages; and our men, women, and children, the possibility of democracy in our country is much greater. If an armed confrontation or international military intervention becomes a reality, it will be virtually impossible to establish a legitimate foundation for a proud future Syria. We call on our people to remain patient as we continue our national Revolution. We will hold the regime fully responsible and accountable for the current situation in the country, the blood of all martyrs – civilian and military, and any risks that may threaten Syria in the future, including the possibility of internal violence or foreign military intervention.
To the victory of our Revolution and to the glory of our martyrs.
The Local Coordinating Committees in Syria, 29-8-2011